Marxism and Objectivism are similar in very few respects: —They are systems of thought. But Marxism is primarily a political and economic
Objectivism holds that the sole purpose of government is to secure our right to live free from force. This implies property rights and
Magic and illusion are actions that aim to produce effects that appear to be paranormal or impossible by the laws of logic and nature that
Marx often tried to blur the difference between economic and political power, to argue that those who command large fortunes have an
Objectivism has no position on most of the questions you ask, and in many cases the same general answer applies: We'll see when we get there
Early in her novel Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand presents us with a scene aboard a train that is entering Philadelphia. “An office building...
In life, we take risks to achieve and maintain values. Objectivism holds that you should choose a course in life that will be conducive to
Cultures, like people, have a sense of life, which Ayn Rand characterized as an "emotional atmosphere." "This emotional atmosphere," she...
Objectivism's social ethic (which underlies its theory of rights) is based on the recognition of a complex fact about rational beings: that
December 20, 2002 -- "Drop the candy cane, step away from the punch bowl." Is that the order we’ll hear some day from armed food cops trying to prevent us from committing holiday health crimes against ourselves? Before you emit a "Ho ho ho" of derision, take a sip of your eggnog (360 calories per cup) and consider the ghost of Christmas future that might haunt us if we’re not careful. Here’s how the criminalization of Christmas goodies might come about. The first contributing element is the "war on fat." Some groups and agencies claim that 65 percent of Americans are overweight and 30 percent are obese. While many Americans do have serious weight problems, by the questionable standard used to generate these stats, athletes like Barry Bonds and Michael Jordan should go on diets. It’s also alleged that 300,000 die each year from weight-related problems. Never mind that the New England Journal of Medicine stated that "that figure is by no means well established. Not only is it derived from weak or incomplete data, but it is also called into question by the methodological difficulties."
December 19, 2005 -- If art holds a mirror to reality, the original 1933 King Kong, the 1976 remake, and the latest version by Peter Jackson show a culture that swung from romantic optimism to cynicism and now is perhaps returning to a healthier sense of life. The original King Kong very much reflected the values of its maker, Merian C. Cooper. When Cooper was six years old, his uncle gave him a book called Explorations and Adventures in Equatorial Africa that inspired his imagination with tales of the jungle and strange animals, including gorillas. He wanted to be an explorer. He went to the U.S. Naval Academy but got booted out for suggesting that the recently-invented airplane could someday sink battleships. He became a bomber pilot in World War I and was shot down and imprisoned by the Germans. After the war, he flew for the Poles who fought Soviet invaders in 1920. He was shot down again and thrown into a communist slave camp but escaped. Years later, he made movies celebrating American values to counter communist propaganda.
February 7, 2002 -- Call it a tribute to the individuality of human taste. How rarely one person feels a strong attraction to another. The phenomenon is so infrequent that we recall, back to our school days, those that made our heart flutter—the moments in time that stand still, during which we experience cinema-like captivation. One’s life experiences result, understandably, in preferences for a certain type of person. Love is a theme universally trumpeted but, by necessity, individually understood. Wherever a discerning mind ponders romance, a unique image of the ideal will materialize. The discovery of that ideal is exhilaration like no other.
The media makes “urban sprawl” sound like some kind of terrible virus that will infect the forests and other green areas of the world and cause them to disappear forever. Urban sprawl refers to replacing forests and farms (which are pretty, and desirable to those who do not have to pay the taxes on them) by other things that are not so pretty, like factories, homes, highways, shopping malls, and people But factories provide jobs for people to improve their standard of living. Home ownership has defined the American dream. New and better highways make it easier for people to get around. Shopping malls are constructed to fill people's need to buy food, clothing, and other items. And just what is wrong with people moving to areas that were once farms and forests? People have been doing this in this country for over 300 years. Why should they stop now?
March 27, 2002 -- President Bush showed rare integrity and character in his actions after September 11. Relying on good principles, he led this country out of its shock and anger and towards justice and restoration. He has repeatedly vowed to root out the terrorist networks perpetrating violence and bring an end to the states sponsoring or aiding these networks. Wherever these terrorists are and whichever states support them, all will be treated alike; all will be brought to justice. However, even after our success against al-Qaeda, the administration has backpedaled on one of the best-known terrorist networks. Yassir Arafat and the PLO routinely aid and protect terrorists and have probably sponsored much terrorism directly.
November 7, 2001 -- As a result of the war on terrorism, many people feel an urge to "do something." It is a noble urge, but, like all urges, requires intelligent direction. Unfortunately, that is just the kind of direction we are not getting. What is happening instead is that politicians are taking advantage of people's honorable desire to do something in order to advocate pet projects. Thus, on November 6, 2001, Senators John McCain and Evan Bayh took to the Op-Ed page of the New York Times to advocate expanded programs of national service, "from promoting literacy to caring for the elderly" ("A New Start for National Service"). To anyone who remembers Senator McCain's presidential bid, this will be all-too-familiar, but it is exactly the reverse of the path that America should be following.
July 19, 2002 -- This is an opportune time for the Bush Administration and Congress to end the Amtrak protection racket. Amtrak's threatened shutdown is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to extort more money from U.S. taxpayers. Having developed consumer dependence upon its commuter trains, shut out competition through its government-created and -subsidized monopoly, and failed to turn a profit, Amtrak has again come, hat in hand, to extort more money in return for not leaving commuters stranded on train platforms. But Amtrak is merely symptomatic of a deeper problem facing our nation: the idea of entitlement. In the case of Amtrak, some small sector of the population has determined that it is entitled to the product of someone else's labor in order to subsidize its own commuter costs. And Amtrak has determined that it is easier to obtain government subsidies than it is to run a passenger railroad line profitably and in competition with other rail lines. The same determinations have been made in agriculture, the steel industry, and hosts of other industries. But what is the justification of such plans, which take the hard-earned wages of some Americans to subsidize failing companies or farmers, or business commuters?
June 11, 2001 -- Richard Boeken smoked two packs a day for over 40 years. He averaged a cigarette every 25 minutes of his waking hours, starting in 1957 at age 13. And now the cancer-ridden Boeken has reaped the rewards of his habit. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles court ruled that cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris is liable for $3 billion in punitive damages for failing to properly inform Boeken of the dangers of smoking. This court-sponsored immunity from personal responsibility is a stronger threat to America than smoking itself. The travesty of the judgment lies not in the size of the damage award, but in the assertion that Boeken is faultless. At the root of this judgment lies the presumption that individuals are incapable of controlling their own behavior. Boeken would have us believe that addiction and false advertising account for the nearly 600,000 cigarettes he lit during forty-plus years of chain smoking. The Philip Morris executives may as well have held the matches to Boeken's Marlboros as he lay strapped to the hoods of their Cadillacs, their influence on him was so powerful.
June 13, 2001 -- Here’s another one for the “There ought to be a law!” file: banning cell phones while driving. It is distracting and may even cause road rage in fellow drivers. There ought to be a law, right? With 40 states considering some type of ban on using cell phones while driving, most people think so. New York Governor George Pataki even issued an executive order banning state employees from using state-issued cell phones while behind the wheel. And the New York state legislature is considering a statewide ban. “There ought to be a law!” On the talk radio circuit, listeners and hosts alike complain about swerving drivers and near-miss accidents. On Capitol Hill, Congress holds hearings. “There ought to be a law!”
October 3, 2001 -- With grim determination, hundreds of rescue workers in lower Manhattan began scrawling their names on their bodies, in case they too joined the staggering ranks of the unidentifiable dead. On the calm campuses of America’s elite universities, however, students wasted no time before wallowing in anti-capitalist slogans, identity politics, and the appeasement of evil. Dragging moral relativism down to new depths, Yale Daily News writer Donald Waack equated a U.S. military response with the terrorist attack itself. "We are willing to sacrifice our lives for the ideals we believe…The men who steered passenger jets into the World Trade Center towers and killed thousands…felt precisely the same way."
January 30, 2002 -- In his powerful State of the Union address, President Bush gave voice to the two deepest truths of a free society: that the essential function of its government is to provide security, and that it depends on a culture of responsibility. On the first of these themes, his words were as clear and forceful as his actions have been in waging the war on terrorism. Looking beyond the immediate threat, he set a long-term goal of eliminating terrorist networks and the regimes that sponsor them. And looking beyond the physical threat, he identified the underlying conflict of values: “They embrace tyranny and death as a cause and a creed….We choose freedom and the dignity of every life.”
Marxism and Objectivism are similar in very few respects: —They are systems of thought. But Marxism is primarily a political and economic
Objectivism holds that the sole purpose of government is to secure our right to live free from force. This implies property rights and
Magic and illusion are actions that aim to produce effects that appear to be paranormal or impossible by the laws of logic and nature that
Marx often tried to blur the difference between economic and political power, to argue that those who command large fortunes have an
Objectivism has no position on most of the questions you ask, and in many cases the same general answer applies: We'll see when we get there
Early in her novel Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand presents us with a scene aboard a train that is entering Philadelphia. “An office building...
In life, we take risks to achieve and maintain values. Objectivism holds that you should choose a course in life that will be conducive to
Cultures, like people, have a sense of life, which Ayn Rand characterized as an "emotional atmosphere." "This emotional atmosphere," she...
Objectivism's social ethic (which underlies its theory of rights) is based on the recognition of a complex fact about rational beings: that
December 20, 2002 -- "Drop the candy cane, step away from the punch bowl." Is that the order we’ll hear some day from armed food cops trying to prevent us from committing holiday health crimes against ourselves? Before you emit a "Ho ho ho" of derision, take a sip of your eggnog (360 calories per cup) and consider the ghost of Christmas future that might haunt us if we’re not careful. Here’s how the criminalization of Christmas goodies might come about. The first contributing element is the "war on fat." Some groups and agencies claim that 65 percent of Americans are overweight and 30 percent are obese. While many Americans do have serious weight problems, by the questionable standard used to generate these stats, athletes like Barry Bonds and Michael Jordan should go on diets. It’s also alleged that 300,000 die each year from weight-related problems. Never mind that the New England Journal of Medicine stated that "that figure is by no means well established. Not only is it derived from weak or incomplete data, but it is also called into question by the methodological difficulties."
December 19, 2005 -- If art holds a mirror to reality, the original 1933 King Kong, the 1976 remake, and the latest version by Peter Jackson show a culture that swung from romantic optimism to cynicism and now is perhaps returning to a healthier sense of life. The original King Kong very much reflected the values of its maker, Merian C. Cooper. When Cooper was six years old, his uncle gave him a book called Explorations and Adventures in Equatorial Africa that inspired his imagination with tales of the jungle and strange animals, including gorillas. He wanted to be an explorer. He went to the U.S. Naval Academy but got booted out for suggesting that the recently-invented airplane could someday sink battleships. He became a bomber pilot in World War I and was shot down and imprisoned by the Germans. After the war, he flew for the Poles who fought Soviet invaders in 1920. He was shot down again and thrown into a communist slave camp but escaped. Years later, he made movies celebrating American values to counter communist propaganda.
February 7, 2002 -- Call it a tribute to the individuality of human taste. How rarely one person feels a strong attraction to another. The phenomenon is so infrequent that we recall, back to our school days, those that made our heart flutter—the moments in time that stand still, during which we experience cinema-like captivation. One’s life experiences result, understandably, in preferences for a certain type of person. Love is a theme universally trumpeted but, by necessity, individually understood. Wherever a discerning mind ponders romance, a unique image of the ideal will materialize. The discovery of that ideal is exhilaration like no other.
The media makes “urban sprawl” sound like some kind of terrible virus that will infect the forests and other green areas of the world and cause them to disappear forever. Urban sprawl refers to replacing forests and farms (which are pretty, and desirable to those who do not have to pay the taxes on them) by other things that are not so pretty, like factories, homes, highways, shopping malls, and people But factories provide jobs for people to improve their standard of living. Home ownership has defined the American dream. New and better highways make it easier for people to get around. Shopping malls are constructed to fill people's need to buy food, clothing, and other items. And just what is wrong with people moving to areas that were once farms and forests? People have been doing this in this country for over 300 years. Why should they stop now?
March 27, 2002 -- President Bush showed rare integrity and character in his actions after September 11. Relying on good principles, he led this country out of its shock and anger and towards justice and restoration. He has repeatedly vowed to root out the terrorist networks perpetrating violence and bring an end to the states sponsoring or aiding these networks. Wherever these terrorists are and whichever states support them, all will be treated alike; all will be brought to justice. However, even after our success against al-Qaeda, the administration has backpedaled on one of the best-known terrorist networks. Yassir Arafat and the PLO routinely aid and protect terrorists and have probably sponsored much terrorism directly.
November 7, 2001 -- As a result of the war on terrorism, many people feel an urge to "do something." It is a noble urge, but, like all urges, requires intelligent direction. Unfortunately, that is just the kind of direction we are not getting. What is happening instead is that politicians are taking advantage of people's honorable desire to do something in order to advocate pet projects. Thus, on November 6, 2001, Senators John McCain and Evan Bayh took to the Op-Ed page of the New York Times to advocate expanded programs of national service, "from promoting literacy to caring for the elderly" ("A New Start for National Service"). To anyone who remembers Senator McCain's presidential bid, this will be all-too-familiar, but it is exactly the reverse of the path that America should be following.
July 19, 2002 -- This is an opportune time for the Bush Administration and Congress to end the Amtrak protection racket. Amtrak's threatened shutdown is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to extort more money from U.S. taxpayers. Having developed consumer dependence upon its commuter trains, shut out competition through its government-created and -subsidized monopoly, and failed to turn a profit, Amtrak has again come, hat in hand, to extort more money in return for not leaving commuters stranded on train platforms. But Amtrak is merely symptomatic of a deeper problem facing our nation: the idea of entitlement. In the case of Amtrak, some small sector of the population has determined that it is entitled to the product of someone else's labor in order to subsidize its own commuter costs. And Amtrak has determined that it is easier to obtain government subsidies than it is to run a passenger railroad line profitably and in competition with other rail lines. The same determinations have been made in agriculture, the steel industry, and hosts of other industries. But what is the justification of such plans, which take the hard-earned wages of some Americans to subsidize failing companies or farmers, or business commuters?
June 11, 2001 -- Richard Boeken smoked two packs a day for over 40 years. He averaged a cigarette every 25 minutes of his waking hours, starting in 1957 at age 13. And now the cancer-ridden Boeken has reaped the rewards of his habit. On Wednesday, a Los Angeles court ruled that cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris is liable for $3 billion in punitive damages for failing to properly inform Boeken of the dangers of smoking. This court-sponsored immunity from personal responsibility is a stronger threat to America than smoking itself. The travesty of the judgment lies not in the size of the damage award, but in the assertion that Boeken is faultless. At the root of this judgment lies the presumption that individuals are incapable of controlling their own behavior. Boeken would have us believe that addiction and false advertising account for the nearly 600,000 cigarettes he lit during forty-plus years of chain smoking. The Philip Morris executives may as well have held the matches to Boeken's Marlboros as he lay strapped to the hoods of their Cadillacs, their influence on him was so powerful.
June 13, 2001 -- Here’s another one for the “There ought to be a law!” file: banning cell phones while driving. It is distracting and may even cause road rage in fellow drivers. There ought to be a law, right? With 40 states considering some type of ban on using cell phones while driving, most people think so. New York Governor George Pataki even issued an executive order banning state employees from using state-issued cell phones while behind the wheel. And the New York state legislature is considering a statewide ban. “There ought to be a law!” On the talk radio circuit, listeners and hosts alike complain about swerving drivers and near-miss accidents. On Capitol Hill, Congress holds hearings. “There ought to be a law!”
October 3, 2001 -- With grim determination, hundreds of rescue workers in lower Manhattan began scrawling their names on their bodies, in case they too joined the staggering ranks of the unidentifiable dead. On the calm campuses of America’s elite universities, however, students wasted no time before wallowing in anti-capitalist slogans, identity politics, and the appeasement of evil. Dragging moral relativism down to new depths, Yale Daily News writer Donald Waack equated a U.S. military response with the terrorist attack itself. "We are willing to sacrifice our lives for the ideals we believe…The men who steered passenger jets into the World Trade Center towers and killed thousands…felt precisely the same way."
January 30, 2002 -- In his powerful State of the Union address, President Bush gave voice to the two deepest truths of a free society: that the essential function of its government is to provide security, and that it depends on a culture of responsibility. On the first of these themes, his words were as clear and forceful as his actions have been in waging the war on terrorism. Looking beyond the immediate threat, he set a long-term goal of eliminating terrorist networks and the regimes that sponsor them. And looking beyond the physical threat, he identified the underlying conflict of values: “They embrace tyranny and death as a cause and a creed….We choose freedom and the dignity of every life.”